← Back to Academic

EiG Framework: Technical Summary

Derivation of Fundamental Constants from Geometric First Principles

J. Crawford · January 2026 · v1.0

Abstract

We present a geometric framework in which the fine structure constant α emerges from the topology of a helicoidal manifold with zero free parameters. Beginning with a single axiom—the dimensional coupling ratio γ = 2/3 derived from holographic boundary considerations—we derive the spinor period T = 18 and channel count N = 11, yielding 1/α = 137.0359477 with 0.376 ppm precision against the experimental value. The same framework predicts ionization energies across 118 elements (R² = 0.944) and explains the Koide formula for lepton mass ratios.

1. Foundational Constant

The framework rests on a single geometric axiom:

\[ \gamma = \frac{2}{3} \]
Dimensional coupling (boundary/bulk ratio)

This ratio emerges from holographic boundary considerations: in a system where information is encoded on a 2D boundary surrounding a 3D bulk, the coupling between surface and volume degrees of freedom is 2/3. This is not fitted—it is the only value consistent with holographic entropy scaling.

2. Derived Constants

2.1 Spinor Period (T)

Fermions require 720° rotation to return to their initial state (spinor double-cover). Combined with the 40° angular step of the 9-fold boundary lattice:

\[ T = \frac{720°}{40°} = 18 \]
Spinor closure period

2.2 Boundary Channels (N)

The number of information channels through the veil, accounting for Period 1 exclusion:

\[ N = T\gamma - 1 = 18 \times \frac{2}{3} - 1 = 11 \]
Carbon channel count

The "−1" reflects Period 1 (H, He), which exists in a pre-axial state—present before Carbon provided the organizing center. This is geometrically observable: H and He sit at ±120° (γ × 180°), encoding the framework ratio without passing through the axis.

3. Fine Structure Constant Derivation

The fine structure constant emerges as the total phase-space coupling:

\[ \frac{1}{\alpha} = T^2 - N(T-1) + \frac{N}{T(T-1)} \]
EiG derivation formula

Expanding with T = 18, N = 11:

Term Calculation Physical Meaning
324 Full spinor-squared lattice
−N(T−1) −187 Channels × wrap-around (bulk contribution)
+N/(T(T−1)) +11/306 = 0.03595... Phase-slip correction (veil leakage)
1/α (derived) = 137.0359477124
1/α (experimental) = 137.035999177 · Error: 0.376 ppm

The integer part (137) arises from lattice alignment. The fractional part (11/306) represents residual phase-slip—information leaking through the boundary at non-nodal points.

4. Derivation Chain

The complete derivation requires zero fitted parameters:

γ = 2/3 T = 18 N = 11 1/α = 137.036

Each step follows necessarily from the previous. No parameter is adjusted to match experiment.

5. Secondary Predictions

5.1 Ionization Energies

The helicoid geometry predicts first ionization energies across the periodic table:

Block Elements
Noble gases He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn 0.99
d-block Sc–Zn, Y–Cd, etc. 0.88
Main group Groups 1, 2, 13–17 0.86
f-block Lanthanides, Actinides 0.83
Overall 118 elements 0.944

The ~6% residual variance is attributed to dynamic effects (electron correlation, relativistic contraction) that require the full quantum treatment of the dual-sheet manifold.

5.2 Koide Formula

The Koide formula for charged lepton masses (1981) gives:

\[ Q = \frac{m_e + m_\mu + m_\tau}{(\sqrt{m_e} + \sqrt{m_\mu} + \sqrt{m_\tau})^2} = 0.666661 \pm 0.000007 \]
Experimental value

This matches γ = 2/3 to 0.0009%. The Koide relation, unexplained for 44 years, is a direct expression of the dimensional coupling constant in the lepton sector.

6. Geometric Structure

The periodic table maps onto a helicoidal manifold with the following properties:

7. Future Directions

The ~6% variance in ionization predictions suggests the "geometric skeleton" requires a "quantum flesh" treatment. Preliminary analysis indicates this residual maps to the phase-slip term 11/306, implying quantum mechanical effects emerge as interference between dual stable states on the helicoid.

Key open problems:

8. Summary

From a single axiom (γ = 2/3), the EiG framework derives:

The periodic table is not flat. It is a helicoid, and its geometry encodes the coupling constants of physics.

Contact: contact@discernibility.org
Interactive visualization: EiG Periodic Helicoid
Full framework: 9 Laws of Emergent Information Geometry (PDF)